Sale-leaseback arrangements can be attracting business looking for a liquidity boost or a technique to manage their financial obligation ratio.
However, for accountants, they can likewise be complex to assess and identify whether a sale has happened.
So how precisely does sale-leaseback accounting work?
This post covers everything you require to learn about these deals, including the significance of sale-leaseback, pros and cons, and accounting examples.
What is a sale-leaseback?
A sale-leaseback (a.k.a. sale and leaseback) deal happens when the owner of an asset offers it, then rents it back through a long-term lease. The initial owner ends up being the seller-lessee, and the buyer of the possession ends up being the buyer-lessor.
While this deal doesn't impact the functional usage of the asset by the seller-lessee, it does have different accounting outcomes for both celebrations. The seller-lessee can continue utilizing the property, however legal ownership is transferred to the buyer-lessor.
Find out more about the duties of lessors and lessees.
What is the function of a sale-leaseback?
The most common reasons to get in a sale-leaseback contract are to raise capital, enhance the balance sheet, or acquire tax benefits. The seller-lessee is normally looking for to release the cash kept in the worth of a residential or commercial property or asset for other purposes but does not wish to compromise their capability to use the possession.
Purchasers who enter into these contracts are usually institutional financiers, leasing business, or financing business pursuing an offer that has a protected return as the buyer-lessor.
Sale-leasebacks are typically seen in markets with high-cost set assets, such as construction, transport, genuine estate, and aerospace.
How does a sale-leaseback work?
In a sale-leaseback agreement, ownership is moved to the buyer-lessor, while the seller-lessee continues to utilize the property. For instance:
- An energy company can sell the properties that comprise their solar-power system to a funding business, then instantly lease it back to operate and fulfill the need of clients.
- Construction companies can offer their realty residential or commercial properties and then instantly rent them back from the purchaser to establish them.
- Aviation business often sell their airplane to an aviation funding organization and immediately rent them back with no time out in their regular routine.
- Real estate companies frequently have sale-leaseback programs that give homeowners more versatility than a standard home sale. Equity in the home can quickly be transformed into money by the seller-lessee, and mortgage brokers get access to a larger client base as the buyer-lessor. These transactions are also referred to as "sell and remain" plans.
Benefits and drawbacks of sale-leasebacks
Sale-leaseback deals have the flexibility to be structured in various methods that can benefit both celebrations. Of course, there are also risks involved in this kind of plan that both celebrations must examine, as well as business and tax ramifications.
Good understanding of the advantages and drawbacks is a crucial element when specifying the agreement. Let's take an appearance at the pros and cons for each celebration.
Pros for the seller-lessee:
- They get the option to expand their business or buy new equipment with the increase of money while keeping daily access to the asset.
- It's a cheaper method to acquire funds compared to loan financing, hence enhancing the balance sheet.
- They can invest money in other places for a higher return, therefore improving the profit and loss declaration (P&L).
- Sale-leaseback permits for the complete deductibility of lease payments with the transfer of tax ownership to the buyer-lessor.
- There's minimal threat due to possession volatility.
Cons for the seller-lessee:
- The owned property is gotten rid of from the balance sheet.
- The right of use (ROU) possession increases, depending upon the lease term and agreed-upon lease payments going beyond fair-market worth.
- They must recognize capital gains.
Pros for the buyer-lessor:
- Rental income over the life of the lease strengthens their monetary position.
- They can guarantee that lease terms are crafted to fit their needs.
- They have more control over return on investment (ROI) based on the conditions laid out in the contract.
- They can reclaim the property if the seller-lessee defaults on payments.
Cons to the buyer-lessor:
- They need to renegotiate agreements if the seller-lessee defaults on lease payments.
- They're the primary creditor/owner if the seller-lessee files for personal bankruptcy.
- There's a threat that the property worth may reduce faster than the forecasted market and end up being impaired.
How to identify if a deal qualifies as a sale-leaseback
To certify as a sale-leaseback, a deal should meet numerous criteria. When assessing the agreement under ASC 842, entities need to apply ASC 606 (earnings from contracts with customers) to figure out whether the sale of an asset has actually taken place. There is a significant quantity of judgement that goes into this process, and it is excellent practice to have an auditor review the information and intricacies of the deal.
Let's review the process action by action.
1. Determine if there's a contract
First, you must determine if there is a contract as discussed in ASC 606-12-25-1 through 8.
Essentially, any contract that develops lawfully enforceable rights and commitments generally satisfies the meaning of a contract. Contracts can be oral, written, or indicated by an entity's customary company practices.
2. Asses if there's a sale
Assess from an accounting viewpoint if there is a sale or a financing contract.
The primary question is if control has transferred from the seller to the buyer, therefore fulfilling the efficiency responsibility. If the response is yes, then a sale has taken place. Otherwise, the failed sale is dealt with as a financing arrangement.
ASC 842 references ASC 606-10-25-30 for a list of signs showing that control has actually been transferred to the buyer-lessor. The five control signs are:
1. The reporting entity has a present right to payment; the buyer-lessor has a present obligation to pay the seller-lessee.
1. The customer has a legal title.
1. The consumer has physical belongings.
1. The customer has significant dangers and rewards of ownership.
1. The client has accepted the property.
This is where judgment will be necessary to assess, primarily from the buyer-lessor's position, if control has been moved. It is not needed that all the indications be satisfied to draw this conclusion. However, it is required that both the seller-lessee and buyer-lessor perform this evaluation individually.
It is possible that while the steps to assess control are similar for both celebrations, each can concern a various conclusion that would affect the event of a certified sale.
For example, celebrations might make varying presumptions relating to factors such as the economic life, fair value of the asset, or the discount rate that would impact the lease classification decision.
If the seller-lessee classifies the lease as a financing lease or the buyer-lessor classifies the lease as a sales-type lease, then the test for control has actually failed. The transaction needs to then follow accounting treatment for a funding transaction. Despite the fact that the seller-lessee no longer legally owns the asset, they would keep it on their books. The earnings would be thought about a funding liability.
Compliance for sale-leaseback deals
Accounting for sale-leasebacks is fairly unchanged by the transition from ASC 840 to ASC 842.
If a deal was previously accounted for as a sale-leaseback under ASC 840, it does not need to be reassessed to identify whether it would have likewise qualified as a sale (or purchase) under ASC 842. The lease component of any transaction that certified as a sale-lease back must be represented by both the lessees and lessors in accordance with transition requirements.
See ASC 842-10-65-1 for assistance on postponed gain or loss balances after shift depending upon the lease classification.
Any deals that were represented as a failed sale-leaseback under ASC 840 ought to be reassessed under the new lease requirement. Seller-lessees need to figure out if a sale would have happened either:
)
1. At any point on or after the start duration of the earliest duration provided in the monetary declaration under ASC 842 (if a reporting entity elects to adjust relative periods).
1. At the reliable date (if a reporting entity chosen to not change relative durations).
If a sale would have occurred, the sale-leaseback needs to be represented according to the lease transition guidance in ASC 842-10-65-1 on a customized retrospective basis from the date a sale is identified to have actually happened.
Buyer-lessors, however, do not require to reevaluate successful purchases previously tape-recorded given that the sale-leaseback design of ASC 840 did not apply to lessors. In this scenario, buyer-lessors need to account for the leaseback in compliance with regular lessor shift guidance.
How to account for sale-leasebacks under ASC 842
If the transaction fulfills the requirements under ASC 842 to qualify as a sale-leaseback, then the seller-lessee will:
- Recognize the sale and any gain or loss-the difference in between the money received and the book value of the possession when the buy-lessor takes control of the property.
- Derecognize the property, eliminating it from the balance sheet.
- Calculate and acknowledge the associated lease liability and ROU asset for leaseback in accordance with ASC 842.
The buyer-lessor should also decide whether the deal resulted in an organization mix based on ASC 805 or an asset acquisition. A property acquisition can be taped according to ASC 350: Residential Or Commercial Property, Plant & Equipment (PP&E). The assessment of the property ought to amount to the fair-market value separate from the leaseback agreement. The contract needs to then be recognized as any other lease contract.
To sum up, ASC 842-40-25-4 gives the following assistance on how to represent the sale-leaseback.
The seller-lessee will: - Recognize the transaction cost when the buyer-lessor gets control of the possession
- Derecognize the hidden asset quantity.
The buyer-lessor will: - Account for the asset purchase.
- Recognize the lease in accordance with ASC 842-30.
How to adjust for off-market terms
Accountants should take additional steps to change for off-market terms. Per ASC 842-40-30-1, the initial step is to determine whether the prices is at fair value utilizing one of the following techniques, depending upon the info readily available:
- Comparison of the sale cost of the asset vs. the reasonable value of the property.
- Comparison of the present worth of the lease payments vs. the present worth of market rental payment
If there is a variance, the sale-leaseback must be adjusted to show the fair-market value of the asset according to ASC 842-40-30-2.
If the price is below reasonable value, the distinction is recorded as pre-paid rent. If the price of the possession is above reasonable worth, the excess is considered additional financing, separate from the lease liability, gotten from the buyer-lessor.
To sum up, if there is a balance in between the price and the fair value, the seller-lessee needs to adjust the effect of the transaction:
Sale rate is lower than reasonable value: Make a modification to increase the list prices through a boost (debit) to prepaid rent (reflected in the seller-lessee's initial measurement of the ROU property).
Sale rate is higher than reasonable value: Make a modification to reduce the list prices through a boost (credit) to additional funding liability.
Sale-leaseback accounting examples
Now that we understand the theory, let's go through a practical example of how sale-leaseback accounting works.
Suppose Blue Sky Airlines sells one of its Boeing airplanes to ABC Aviation. Blue Sky Airlines is the seller-lessee and ABC Aviation is the buyer-lessor. Let's see what it looks like if the sale price is lower than reasonable value and higher than reasonable value.
Sale rate or lease payments are lower than reasonable worth
Let's state the seller-lessee sold the possession at a discount rate or less than market worth. Thus, they ought to recognize the difference and change for it with the right-of-use possession quantity for lease accounting.
- Asset sale amount: $78.5 million.
- Fair-market worth: $84 million.
- Lease duration: 18 years.
- Annual lease payment: $3 million.
- Rate of interest: 6%.
The ROU present worth of $3 million for 18 years at 6% rates of interest is $32,482,810. The difference in the market worth and prices is $5.5 M.
Sale rate or lease payments are greater than reasonable value
Now, let's say the seller-lessee offered the possession at a premium or more than market value.
- Asset sale amount: $86 million.
- Fair market price: $84 million.
- Lease duration: 18 years.
- Annual lease payment = $3 million.
- Interest rate: 6%.
The ROU present worth of $3 million for 18 years at 6% rate of interest is $32,482,810. The difference in the market value and prices is $2 million.
Blue Sky Airlines will tape the following journal entries for this transaction.
Note: PP&E is taped at bring value with the seller-lessee. Gain on the sale is the distinction in the price ($ 86M) and the bring value ($ 80M) of the property less the off-market change ($ 2M).
Simplify lease accounting with NetLease
As you can see, sale-leaseback transactions can be lengthy to handle, specifically if you're accounting for them by hand.
But there's a better way. Accounting software can simplify the process, helping you abide by lease accounting standards and handle leases perfectly.
